🔗 Share this article

Per a new review, numerous of individuals with experience in the petroleum sector have been positioned within the present administration, comprising above 40 who previously been employed directly for oil corporations.

Background of the Study

This analysis investigated the backgrounds of candidates and appointees working in the administration and several federal agencies responsible for climate regulation. Those include major entities such as the Environmental Protection Agency, the interior agency, and the Department of Energy.

Broader Regulatory Climate

The analysis comes while persistent actions to dismantle energy rules and renewable energy supports. As an example, latest legislation have opened large areas of federal territory for extraction and eliminated backing for renewable power.

With the barrage of bad actions that have transpired on the climate front... it’s crucial to inform the people that these aren’t just actions from the amorphous, massive thing that is the leadership writ large, commented a researcher involved in the analysis. It is often specific individuals coming from certain moneyed sectors that are implementing this damaging pro-industry plan.

Major Results

Authors discovered 111 employees whom they considered as energy sector veterans and alternative energy adversaries. This covers 43 officials who were previously serving by coal companies. Included in them are high-profile top leaders such as the top energy official, who previously acted as chief executive of a fracking firm.

The list furthermore includes lesser-known White House staff. For example, the department handling energy efficiency is managed by a ex- gas manager. Similarly, a senior policy consultant in the White House has held top-level jobs at major petroleum companies.

Further Connections

Another 12 personnel possess connections to industry-backed conservative research groups. Those cover ex- members and researchers of organizations that have strongly resisted clean power and advocated the use of conventional sources.

Additionally 29 further staff are former industry leaders from polluting fields whose operations are closely connected to oil and gas. Other individuals have relationships with utility firms that distribute fossil fuels or public leaders who have advocated pro-oil initiatives.

Agency Emphasis

Researchers discovered that 32 staff at the Department of the Interior individually have connections to extractive energy, rendering it the most affected government department. That includes the leader of the agency, who has repeatedly taken oil support and functioned as a bridge between oil and gas sector donors and the administration.

Political Contributions

Fossil fuel contributors contributed significant money to the election initiative and swearing-in. After assuming power, the government has not only implemented industry-friendly regulations but also crafted benefits and exemptions that favor the industry.

Qualifications Issues

In addition to energy-connected nominees, the analysts noted a number of White House officials who were appointed to key roles with scant or no pertinent expertise.

Those people may not be connected to the energy sector so directly, but their lack of expertise is dangerous, said one analyst. It is reasonable to think they will be easily influenced, or easy marks, for the fossil fuel plans.

For example, the nominee to lead the EPA’s department of chief legal officer has minimal legal background, having not once handled a legal matter to verdict, nor taken a deposition, and never argued a court petition.

During another instance, a executive aide working on regulatory issues moved to the job after being employed in positions separate to energy, with no clear relevant field or administrative experience.

Administration Reaction

A representative for the executive branch criticized the findings, saying that the leadership’s personnel are extremely qualified to implement on the voters’ mandate to expand national energy development.

Historical and Current Context

This leadership implemented a significant series of pro-industry actions during its first period. In its present period, backed with conservative plans, it has spearheaded a far more extensive and stricter crackdown on climate rules and clean power.

There’s no hesitation, commented a researcher. They are willing and willing to go out there and publicize the fact that they are executing benefits for the energy sector, mining industry, the energy industry.