🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to protect women from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final authority now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to end all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups characterized as a major setback for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move proposed by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent decision has sparked widespread protest both inside Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a protest for the coming week, accusing MPs of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Potential Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds support, the president could possibly return the legislation for further review if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could influence similar debates in additional EU countries